0.05). The numbers of red blood cells showed a significant difference between T1 (control) and three other treatments. A significant difference was observed in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, between T1 and T2. T2 contained the highest number of white blood cells (WBC). The number of lymphocytes were increased and the number of neutrophils were decreased, with increasing the amount of Immunogen (P>0.05). Body composition analysis showed no significant difference between treatments. However, crude protein showed an increasing trend with increasing levels of probiotic. The results showed that the addition of 2 to 5 grams of Immunogen per kg diet can improve the growth performance, final production, and health (immune system) in Koi fingerlings. Therefore, due to the fact that there was no significant difference between T2 and T3 in measured parameters, 2g Immunogen per kg diet was chosen as the optimum level.]]>
p. 117−125
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
p. 127−137
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
p. 138−147
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
0.05). The parameters of SGR, CF, crude fat and ash had no significant differences among experimental diets (P<0.05). The highest lipase activity from pyloric caeca and intestine was observed in the fish fed with diet C with a significant difference than that from other diets (P>0.05). Based on the results of growth performance, body composition, lipase activity and broken line data analysis was revealed that the diet containing 50% grapeseed oil (C) could be appropriate for rainbow trout growth.]]>
p. 148−160
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
p. 161−169
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
0.05).]]>
p. 170−178
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
p. 179−188
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
p. 189−203
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
0.05). The results suggest that dietary nucleotides administration at 2 g Kg-1exerted positive effects on Reproduction indices, hematological indices of rainbow trout broodstock.]]>
p. 204−210
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
0.05) compared to the other treatments. On the other hand, CS/RE coating retarded lipid oxidation by decreasing PV and TBA production in the samples compared to the control up to the end of refrigerated storage (P<0.05).]]>
p. 211−220
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2
p. 1−10
2423-7809
Vol.70/No.2