A survey on feeding of sea urchin (Echinometra mathaei) in the tidal zone in the Coasts of Chabahar

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Marine Biology, Faculty Of Marine Science, Chabahar Maritme University, Iran

2 MS.c.; Department of Marine Biology, Faculty Of Marine Science, Chabahar Maritme University, Iran

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the diet of sea urchin Echinometra mathaei; inter-tidal zones of Chabahar coast of the Persian date Shahrivar 1391, during a period when the Persian date Farvardin 1392, at 3 stations were seasonal. Sea urchin fisheries have been transferred to the lab and then dissected under a microscope to identify the contents of the digestive tract of animals was carried out. The results of this study identify the algae present in the digestive tract vitriol and prioritize them according to type (brown algae - red - green), respectively. Such a result was obtained, with a variety of high-Sea urchin that feeds on the current growth and gonad production is also effective. On the basis of studies have noted that E.mathaei of brown algae (kelp, Sargassum) and red algae (Grasylarya) power to bring the results of this study also noted. In the E.mathaei Sea urchin species of brown algae is feeding on your location and the next priority of green and red algae, and sometimes other animals (larvae, crustaceans and corals) feeds.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]. Kroh, A. (2010). Echinometra mathaei (Blainville, 1825)". In A. Kroh & R. Mooi. World Echinoidea Database. World Register of Marine Species. 9-19
[2]. Boyer, M). 2012. ( "Burrowing urchin (Echinometra mathaei). World Register of Marine Species. 9-19
[3]. Dorit, R. L., Walker, W. F., & Barnes, R. D. (1991) Zoology. Newyork: Saunders College.
]4 [.خالقی, م., و عوفی, ف. (1389). شناسایی گونه های خارپوستان دریایی در نواحی بین جزر و مدی خلیج چابهار. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی محیط زیست جانوری-سال دوم، شماره 4, شماره4, 31-36.
] 5[ .عوفی, م. خ. (1389). بررسی تراکم و الگوی پراکنش و پایداری توتیای دریایی (Stomopneustes variolaris: Echinoidea) در نواحی بین جزر و مدی خلیج چابهار. اقیانوس شناسی.سال سوم.شماره 9, 9-15.
[6]. Ásbjörnsson, H. P(2011) Management and Utilization of Green sea Urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) in Eyjafjörður, Northern Iceland. University of Akureyri School of Business and Science Faculty of Natural Resource Science,1-115.
[7]. Cook, E. K..(1998), Somatic and gonadal growth in the sea urchin,Psammechinus miliaris fed on an artificial diet compared to a natural macroalgal diet. J. Shellfish Research, . 1549-1555
[8]. Andrew, N. L. (2002). Status and management of world sea urchin fisheries. Oceanography and Marin Bioloby: an Annual Review, 343-425.
[9]. V.jaccarini. (2005). Effects of seasonality and population density on the reproduction of the Indo-pacific echinoid Echinometra mathaei Kenyan coral reef lagoons. Marine Biology, 445-5-453.
[10]. Uehara, Y. H. (2007). Feedin g Ecology of Four Species of Sea Urchins (Genus Echinometra) in Okinawa. Bulttin Of Marine Science. 81, 85-100.
[11]. Yuji Hiratsuka,T.U.(2007). Feeding rates and absorption efficiencies of four species of sea urchin (genus Echinometra) fed a prepared diet. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 223-229.
[12]. Kaneko,Y.N. (1975). Culture Experiments on the Sea Urchin Strongylocentrouts pulcherrimus Fed an Artificial Diet. Marine Biology, 105-108.
[13]. Elizabeth J. Cook, M. S. (2007).. Effect of variation in the protein value of the red macroalga Palmaria palmata on the feeding, growth and gonad composition of the sea urchins Psammechinus miliaris and Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata ). Aquaculture,207-217.
[14]. Elizabeth J. Cook, M. V. (2000). Fatty acid compositions if gonadal material and diets of the sea urchin, Psammechinus miliaris: trophic and nutritional implication. Marine bioogy and Ecology, 261-274.
[15]. U.Jacob,S.T. (2003). High-Antarctic regular sea urchins- the role of depth and feeding in nich separation. Polar Biol, 99-104.
[16]. Devin A. Lyons, R. E.(2007). Effect of dietary history and algal traits on feeding rate and food preference in the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 349, 194-204.
[17]. Fiona Tomas, A.B. (2011). Effect of invasive seaweeds on feeding preference and performance of keystone Mediterranean herbivore. Biol Invasions, 1559-1570.
[18]. Suzanne C. Mills, M. P. C. (2000). Ingestion and transformation of algal turf by Echinometra mathaei on Tiahura fringing reef (French Polynesia). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 254, 71-84.
[19]. D. Vatilington, R. R. (2003). Feeding preferences, seasonal gut repletion indices, and diel feeding patterns of the sea urchin Trioneustes gratilla ( Echinodermata: Echinoidea) on a coastal habitat off Toliara ( Madagascar). Marine Biology. 451-458.
[20]. Borton, R. L. (2003). A study of feeding preferences of Stongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Zoology ,1-10.
[21]. Thomas J. Lyimo, F. M..(2011), Food preference of the sea urchin Tripneustes gratilla (Linnaeus, 1785) in tropical seagrass habitats at Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Ecology and the Natural Environment 3, 415-423.
]22[. قادیکلایی ،ب، م. (1389). اطلس جلبک‌های دریایی سواحل خلیج فارس و دریای عمان. تهران: انتشارات علمی آبزیان.
[23]. Khamala, C. P. (1971). Ecology of Echinometra mathaei (Echinoidea: Echinodermata) at Diani Beach, Kenya. Marine Biology,11. 167-172.
[24]. Malcolm Telford, A. S. (1987). Feeding stuctures, behavior, and microhabitat of Echinocyamus pusillus (Echinoidea: Clypeasteroida). Reference: BioL Bull ,747-757.
[25]. S. Contreras, J. C. (1987). Feeding behavior and morphological adaptations in two sympatric sea urchin species in central chile. Marine Ecology, 217-224.